Prince Harry has lost his appeal against the UK government’s decision to revoke his automatic taxpayer-funded police protection when visiting the United Kingdom. The High Court upheld the 2020 ruling by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (RAVEC), which determined that Harry would no longer receive the same level of security following his departure from royal duties and relocation to the United States.
In the judgment, the court found that the decision was neither unlawful nor procedurally unfair. Justice Peter Lane stated that the approach taken by RAVEC was rational and proportionate, considering Harry’s change in status as a non-working royal.
Prince Harry had argued that the removal of his security detail was unjust, citing concerns for his family’s safety and the potential risks associated with his high-profile status. He also offered to personally fund police protection during his visits, but this request was denied. The court maintained that allowing individuals to pay for specialized police services could set a problematic precedent and strain limited resources.
Following the ruling, a spokesperson for Prince Harry expressed disappointment and indicated plans to appeal the decision. They emphasized that the Duke of Sussex seeks a fair application of security protocols, not preferential treatment.
The outcome of this case has implications for Prince Harry’s future visits to the UK, particularly concerning the safety of his wife, Meghan Markle, and their children. The family has made limited trips to Britain since their move to California in 2020.
As the legal proceedings continue, the royal family has remained focused on official duties, including recent public appearances for the 80th anniversary of VE Day. King Charles III and other senior royals have not publicly commented on the court’s decision.
WATCH the video of Prince Harry saying he’s sad about it:
Watch Free Videos at TrendingViews
