Amy Klobuchar goes after Trump’s comments on judges, then eats crow right after

10 1

11K
90%
2 weeks ago

Amy Klobuchar was talking about President Donald Trump’s comments about judges, but then GOP witness Jesse Panuccio reminded her about Chuck Schumer’s own words. Amy Klobuchar, a Democratic Senator from Minnesota, has consistently expressed strong opposition to Donald Trump, both during his presidency and afterward. Her public statements, actions, and voting record indicate a clear disapproval of Trump and his policies, though she has not explicitly framed it as a personal "dislike" in every instance. Instead, her criticism focuses on his leadership style, policy decisions, and impact on democracy.

For example, during her 2020 presidential campaign, Klobuchar warned that Trump would "spend the next four years tearing our country apart," highlighting her belief that his leadership was divisive and harmful. She has also criticized his handling of issues like election integrity, climate change, and foreign policy—once questioning how "coddling up to Vladimir Putin makes America great again." In 2021, she voted to convict Trump during his second impeachment trial over the January 6th Capitol riot, accusing him of inciting the event. More recently, in 2024, she remarked that people are "tired of seeing this rerun of him saying these nutty things," reflecting frustration with his persistent political presence.

Even when participating in bipartisan duties, such as chairing Trump’s 2025 inauguration committee and delivering a speech at the event, Klobuchar maintained a professional tone but subtly acknowledged past tensions, like the Capitol riot, while emphasizing democratic principles over personal endorsement. Her support for some of Trump’s 2025 cabinet nominees shows a willingness to work across party lines, but this pragmatic approach does not soften her broader critique of his agenda.

In short, while Klobuchar avoids purely personal attacks, her consistent opposition—through speeches, votes, and policy disagreements—demonstrates a deep-seated disapproval of Trump and what he represents politically. Whether this constitutes "dislike" in a personal sense is less clear, but professionally and ideologically, she stands firmly against him.