Skip to content

California spent $24 billion, basically has no clue how it went

 

Gotta leave it to the boneheads over in California to waste $24 billion and then not have any clue about what happened afterward. News reports say CA politicians dedicated $24 billion to homelessness, but didn’t consistently track the results properly, meaning they’ve got pretty much NO IDEA how the money spent impacted the community. Did anyone stop being homeless thanks to all this money spent? Or did homelessness stay the same or get worse?

The news report on CBS News talks about the audit in California and the aftermath of spending $24 billion to solve a problem, but then having no real idea of the effects the money spent. As you can imagine, taxpayers are livid and Greasy Gavin Newsom is being called out. The news report on CBS stated:

With makeshift tents lining the streets and disrupting businesses in cities and towns throughout California, homelessness has become one of the most frustrating and seemingly intractable issues in the country’s most populous state. An estimated 171,000 people are homeless in California, which amounts to roughly 30% of all of the homeless people in the U.S.

Despite the roughly billions of dollars spent on more than 30 homeless and housing programs during the 2018-2023 fiscal years, California doesn’t have reliable data needed to fully understand why the problem didn’t improve in many cities, according to state auditor’s report.

A letter was written that called out Gavin Newsom and insisted that they take action to track the performance of the money spent to determine if it’s effectively spent or not. I wonder if people were laundering the money… not saying they were, just wondering. The other thing I’d like to mention is that California seems like one giant sh*thole that looks like a third-world country in some areas. It’s like west hemisphere Haiti.



Are you voting for Trump or Kamala?*
This poll subscribes you to our FREEmium newsletter and content. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.