A SCOTUS filing could be bad news for Special Counsel Jack Smith in the fight against former President Donald Trump. Jack Smith is a name you've seen in the news and politics sections of most news publishers as the trials and tribulations in the "witch hunt" against Trump continue. The American Tribune reported on the SCOTUS filing and what it could mean for Jack Smith...<br /> <blockquote> <p>Three respected legal scholars and political figures, former Attorney General Ed Meese, Professor Gary Lason, and Steven Calabresi, have just moved the ball forward on attempting to stop the campaign against former President Donald Trump. They did so by filing a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States to declare that Jack Smith was never constitutionally appointed as Special Counsel and thus that he should be stripped of his powers and his actions so far be rendered moot.</p> <p>In the writ of cert, the three constitutional scholars argue that the correct constitutional process for a Special Counsel should be, since only Congress can create offices subordinate to the Attorney General’s role, for the President to appoint a Special Counsel who is then only vested with his or her powers after the Senate confirms the Special Counsel in the role.</p> </blockquote>
View the Full Link: SCOTUS filing could spell DOOM for Jack Smith
View the Full Link: SCOTUS filing could spell DOOM for Jack Smith
