Michael Cohen, a former personal attorney for Donald Trump, has made a striking admission regarding his involvement in both the criminal case concerning “hush money” payments and the civil fraud case spearheaded by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Cohen, who served as a central witness during the 2024 trial linked to the hush money allegations, claims he felt pressured to provide testimony that aligned with the prosecution’s narrative.
Overview of Cohen’s Role
Cohen’s involvement in the criminal case revolves around allegations that Trump falsified business records during the 2016 presidential campaign. These alleged falsehoods were related to payments made to prevent claims of extramarital affairs from surfacing. The case has faced substantial criticism for its legal strategies, including accusations of employing questionable legal theories and the perceived involvement of officials from the Biden Justice Department in expanding statutes of limitations.
The charges stemmed from payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, which Cohen testified were done at Trump’s direction. He stated that the purpose of the $130,000 payment was to keep her story from affecting Trump’s chances of winning the presidency.
Civil Fraud Case Insights
In the civil fraud case led by Letitia James, Cohen testified in 2023 regarding Trump and his organization’s financial practices. This case alleges that Trump inflated asset values in financial statements with the intent to secure favorable loan terms and insurance deals. This case is also facing scrutiny and an appellate court recently overturned a hefty $454 million penalty associated with it, deeming it unconstitutional.
Cohen’s Recent Admissions
In a recent post on Substack, Cohen revealed that he felt coerced during his testimony, alleging that he was encouraged to provide information that would help secure convictions against Trump. He expressed that from his first meetings with attorneys from both the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and the Attorney General’s Office, he sensed pressure to conform to the prosecution’s desires.
Cohen recounted instances where prosecutors reportedly used leading questions to extract answers that would bolster their case. He noted that his initial interactions with Manhattan DA prosecutors began while he was serving a three-year prison sentence, during which he sought to understand the potential benefits of cooperating with the investigation.
After his release to home confinement in 2020, Cohen continued to cooperate, hoping it would lead to a reduction in his supervised release terms. In his post, he also critiqued the manner in which the cases were pursued, referencing Letitia James’ initial campaign promise to prosecute Trump.
Reactions and Ongoing Appeals
Cohen’s recent statements mark a notable shift from his previous stance as a vocal critic of Trump. Trump’s response characterized the investigations as a predetermined setup. He expressed discontent with the New York court’s handling of these matters and is currently appealing both the criminal and civil cases in their entirety.
The legal landscape surrounding these cases continues to evolve, drawing significant attention as they develop. As key figures involved navigate these proceedings, the implications for Trump and the legal precedents set by these cases will likely remain closely monitored.
For continuous updates on this evolving situation, stay tuned to the latest news.
Read more at: ‘Star Witness’ Makes Bombshell Admission About Letitia James’ Case Against Trump