A judicial controversy is unfolding as pressure mounts for U.S. District Judge John Bates to withdraw his recent ruling against President Donald Trump’s efforts to eliminate government-run websites promoting gender ideology. The uproar comes after revelations that Bates’ spouse has personally benefited from programs tied to the very agency Trump is attempting to dismantle.
Bates’ ruling, issued last week, blocked Trump’s executive order targeting what the administration calls “gender ideology extremism.” The order is part of a broader initiative to scale back the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and cut funding for related programs. In his decision, Bates argued that eliminating these websites would leave affected individuals without recourse, preventing them from accessing critical information and services.
But scrutiny quickly turned to Bates’ own connections to USAID. According to an investigation by *The Western Journal*, Bates’ wife, Carol Rhees, founded *Hope for Children in Ethiopia*, a nonprofit that has received direct funding from USAID. The organization has reportedly secured “hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal grants,” raising concerns about a potential conflict of interest in Bates’ ruling.
The revelation sparked an immediate backlash from conservative figures, including Elon Musk, who is leading Trump’s government streamlining initiative under the newly created Department of Government Efficiency. Musk amplified the report on X, writing, “No kidding. Yet another corrupt judge.”
Bates is not the only federal judge under fire for perceived bias against Trump’s agenda. Conservative activist Laura Loomer recently accused U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr. of a conflict of interest due to his daughter’s employment at the U.S. Department of Education—another agency targeted for restructuring by Trump and Musk, said a report on USA Journal.
With calls growing for judicial accountability, the controversy highlights a larger debate about the power of federal judges and their ability to issue nationwide injunctions. Republican lawmakers, increasingly frustrated by rulings that stall Trump’s reforms, are pushing for legislation to curb judicial overreach.
As these battles intensify, the fight over the federal bureaucracy is shaping up to be a defining clash of Trump’s second term. Whether Bates will address the concerns surrounding his ruling remains to be seen, but the pressure isn’t likely to subside anytime soon.
